Cumulative deaths up to 5th of September |
By James Gallagher Health editor, BBC News website
This isn't just the worst single Ebola outbreak in history,
it has now killed more than all the others combined.
Healthcare workers are visibly struggling, the response to
the outbreak has been damned as "lethally inadequate"
and the
situation is showing signs of getting considerably worse.
The outbreak has been running all year, but the latest in a
stream of worrying statistics shows 40% of all the deaths have been in just the
past three weeks.
So what can we expect in the months, and possibly years, to
come?
Crystal-ball gazing can be a dangerous affair, particularly
as this is uncharted territory.
Previous outbreaks have been rapidly contained, affecting
just dozens of people; this one has already infected more than 3,900.
But the first clues are in the current data.
Dr Christopher Dye, the director of strategy in the office
of the director general at the World Health Organization, has the difficult
challenge of predicting what will happen next.
He told the BBC: "We're quite worried, I have to say,
about the latest data we've just gathered."
Up until a couple of weeks ago, the outbreak was raging in
Liberia especially close to the epicentre of the outbreak in Lofa County and in
the capital Monrovia.
However, the two other countries primarily hit by the
outbreak, Sierra Leone and Guinea, had been relatively stable. Numbers of new
cases were not falling, but they were not soaring either.
That is no longer true, with a surge in cases everywhere
except some parts of rural Sierra Leone in the districts of Kenema and
Kailahun.
"In most other areas, cases and deaths appear to be
rising. That came as a shock to me," said Dr Dye.
The stories of healthcare workers being stretched beyond
breaking point are countless.
A lack of basic protective gear such as gloves has been
widely reported.
Continue reading the main story
The charity Medecins Sans Frontieres has an isolation
facility with 160 beds in Monrovia. But it says the queues are growing and they
need another 800 beds to deal with the number of people who are already sick.
This is not a scenario for containing an epidemic, but
fuelling one.
Dr Dye's tentative forecasts are grim: "At the moment
we're seeing about 500 new cases each week. Those numbers appear to be
increasing.
"I've just projected about five weeks into the future
and if current trends persist we would be seeing not hundreds of cases per
week, but thousands of cases per week and that is terribly disturbing.
"The situation is bad and we have to prepare for it
getting worse."
The World Health Organization is using an educated guess of
20,000 cases before the end, in order to plan the scale of the response.
But the true potential of the outbreak is unknown and the
WHO figure has been described to me as optimistic by some scientists.
The outbreak started in Gueckedou in Guinea, on the border
with Liberia and Sierra Leone.
But it has spread significantly with the WHO reporting that
"for the first time since the outbreak began" that the majority of
cases in the past week were outside of that epicentre with the capital cities
becoming major centres of Ebola.
Additionally one person took the infection to Nigeria, where
it has since spread in a small cluster and there has been an isolated case in
Senegal.
Prof Simon Hay, from the University of Oxford, will publish
his scientific analysis of the changing face of Ebola outbreaks in the next
week.
He warns that as the total number of cases increases, so
does the risk of international spread.
He told me: "I think you're going to have more and more
of these individual cases seeding into new areas, continued flows into Senegal,
Cote d'Ivoire, and all the countries in between, so I'm not very optimistic at
the moment that we're containing this epidemic."
There is always the risk that one of these cases could
arrive in Europe or North America.
However, richer countries have the facilities to prevent an
isolated case becoming an uncontrolled outbreak.
The worry is that other African countries with poor
resources would not cope and find themselves in a similar situation to Guinea,
Liberia and Sierra Leone.
"Nigeria is the one I look at with great concern. If
things started to get out of control in Nigeria I really think that, because of
its connectedness and size, that could be quite alarming," said Prof Hay.
It is also unclear when this outbreak will be over.
Officially the World Health Organization is saying the
outbreak can be contained in six to nine months. But that is based on getting
the resources to tackle the outbreak, which are currently stretched too thinly
to contain Ebola as it stands.
There have been nearly 4,000 cases so far, cases are
increasing exponentially and there is a potentially vulnerable population in
Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea in excess of 20 million.
Ebola deaths - probable, confirmed and suspected: 1,089 Liberia, 517 Guinea,
491 Sierra Leone, 8 Nigeria- Source:
WHO
Prof Neil Ferguson, the director of the UK Medical Research
Council's centre for outbreak analysis and modelling at Imperial College
London, is providing data analysis for the World Health Organization.
He is convinced that the three countries will eventually get
on top of the outbreak, but not without help from the rest of the world.
"The authorities are completely overwhelmed. All the
trends are the epidemic is increasing, it's still growing exponentially, so
there's certainly no reason for optimism.
"It is hard to make a long-term prognosis, but this is
certainly something we'll be dealing with in 2015.
"I can well imagine that unless there is a ramp-up of
the response on the ground, we'll have flare-ups of cases for several months
and possibly years."
It is certainly a timeframe that could see an experimental
Ebola vaccine, which began safety testing this week, being used on the front
line.
If the early trials are successful then healthcare workers
could be vaccinated in November this year.
Here forever
But there are is also a fear being raised by some
virologists that Ebola may never be contained.
Prof Jonathan Ball, a virologist at the University of
Nottingham, describes the situation as "desperate".
His concern is that the virus is being given its first major
opportunity to adapt to thrive in people, due to the large number of
human-to-human transmissions of the virus during this outbreak of unprecedented
scale.
Ebola is thought to come from fruit bats; humans are not its
preferred host.
But like HIV and influenza, Ebola's genetic code is a strand
of RNA. Think of RNA as the less stable cousin of DNA, which is where we keep
our genetic information.
It means Ebola virus has a high rate of mutation and with
mutation comes the possibility of adapting.
Prof Ball argues: "It is increasing exponentially and
the fatality rate seems to be decreasing, but why?
"Is it better medical care, earlier intervention or is
the virus adapting to humans and becoming less pathogenic? As a virologist
that's what I think is happening."
There is a relationship between how deadly a virus is and
how easily it spreads. Generally speaking if a virus is less likely to kill
you, then you are more likely to spread it - although smallpox was a notable
exception.
Prof Ball said "it really wouldn't surprise me" if
Ebola adapted, the death rate fell to around 5% and the outbreak never really
ended.
"It is like HIV, which has been knocking away at
human-to-human transmission for hundreds of years before eventually finding the
right combo of beneficial mutations to spread through human populations."
Collateral damage
Malaria carrying mosquito Malaria season is starting in West
Africa
It is also easy to focus just on Ebola when the outbreak is
having a much wider impact on these countries.
The malaria season, which is generally in September and
October in West Africa, is now starting.
This will present a number of issues. Will there be capacity
to treat patients with malaria? Will people infected with malaria seek
treatment if the nearest hospital is rammed with suspected Ebola cases? How
will healthcare workers cope when malaria and Ebola both present with similar
symptoms.
And that nervousness about the safety of Ebola-rife
hospitals could damage care yet further. Will pregnant women go to hospital to
give birth or stay at home where any complications could be more deadly.
The collateral damage from Ebola is unlikely to be assessed
until after the outbreak.
No matter where you look there is not much cause for
optimism.
The biggest unknown in all of this is when there will be
sufficient resources to properly tackle the outbreak.
Prof Neil Ferguson concludes: "This summer has there
have been many globally important news stories in Ukraine and the Middle East,
but what we see unfolding in West Africa is a catastrophe to the population,
killing thousands in the region now and we're seeing a breakdown of the fragile
healthcare system.
"So I think it needs to move up the political agenda
rather more rapidly than it has."
No comments:
Post a Comment